Which method is commonly NOT used by an Architect to conduct a Post Occupancy Evaluation?

The method that is commonly not used by an architect to conduct a Post Occupancy Evaluation is visual inspection by the architect only. In a Post Occupancy Evaluation (POE), a comprehensive understanding of how users interact with a space is essential. While visual inspections can provide some insights into a building's condition, they are limited in scope as they don't capture user experiences, functional performance, or satisfaction.

To gain a holistic view, architects typically employ a combination of methods that engage with the building occupants directly. Surveys and questionnaires are effective tools for gathering quantitative data on occupant satisfaction and functionality. Interviews with occupants allow for more nuanced insights and qualitative feedback, fostering a deeper understanding of user experiences within the space. Cost analysis and usage statistics can inform aspects of how well the building meets its intended purpose, focusing on operational efficiency and user patterns.

In contrast, relying solely on visual inspections fails to incorporate valuable input from the people who utilize the environment daily, making it less effective as a standalone method in the POE process.